Factors Influencing the Decision to Use Sterilization Contraception Among Reproductive-Age Couples

Mufida Dian Hardika, Sundari Sundari

Abstract


Background: Although permanent contraception is one of the most efficacious contraceptive methods, its adoption remains minimal in rural Indonesia, particularly in Madiun Regency. This situation underscores a paradox: demographic eligibility is present, yet adoption remains constrained, indicating underlying psychosocial obstacles. Prior research has infrequently examined the concurrent influence of motivation and attitude, resulting in a deficiency in comprehending the behavioural determinants of sterilisation choices. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was performed with 138 couples of reproductive age in the jurisdiction of Bangunsari Health Centre. Data were gathered with a validated Likert-scale questionnaire that evaluated motivation and attitude. Statistical study encompassed chi-square tests and logistic regression to investigate correlations and identify primary factors. Results: The study revealed that 43% of participants shown little motivation, and 69% displayed negative attitudes towards permanent contraception. A substantial association was identified between motivation and attitude levels (p < 0.05), indicating that highly motivated individuals were markedly more inclined to possess positive attitudes. Principal obstacles comprised apprehension of irreversible adverse consequences, societal stigma, and insufficient spousal communication. Elevated motivation correlated with a sense of security, perceived efficacy of contraception, and fulfilment of intended family size. Conclusion: Motivation and attitude are critical behavioural factors influencing the decision to take permanent contraception. This study addresses a significant research gap by combining both dimensions within a specific rural context. To enhance adoption, family planning initiatives must include behaviour change communication (BCC), encourage partner-based counselling, and tackle emotional obstacles that prevent informed, voluntary contraceptive decisions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lou S, Ryberg A, Becher N, Lund ICB, Vogel I. Making Sense of a Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 16 Mosaicism in the Placenta: A Qualitative Study of Pregnant Women’s Decision Making. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2025;45(5):608–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6751

Kim JH, Chung W, Lee S, Suh M, Kang DR. Determinants of Sterilization among Married Couples in Korea. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2007;40(6):461. http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.6.461

Hoq MN, Hossain ME, Sultana I. Determinants of Sterilization Birth Control Method in Bangladesh. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;07(09):31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.79003

Khatry RA, Ghimmire N, Joshi Shrestha R, Sherpa Awasthi M, Shrestha N. Factors affecting the choice of contraceptives among married women of reproductive age. Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2020;7(3):95–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpahs.v7i3.33833

Momanyi L, Akinyi Mb, Jeff Murangiri G, James Mutei M. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers Influencing Hormonal Contraceptive Utilization among Women Afflicted with Retroviral Disease Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy at a Referral Hospital in Kenya. Journal of Clinical Care and Medical Advancement. 2025;2(1):47–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.58460/jccma.v2i1.63

Minhas S, Sekhon H. Psychosocial determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in a rural area of Maharashtra. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2014;3(1):53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/j.2319-5886.3.1.011

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

Idris H. Factors Affecting the Use of Contraceptive in Indonesia: Analysis from the National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2019;15(1):117–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v15i1.14098

Antarini A. Factors influencing use of modern contraception among reproductive aged women in Bangka Belitung Province, Indonesia. Pan African Medical Journal. 2021;39:39. http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.39.28870

Suryaningrat DN, Suniyadewi NW, Dewi Puspawati NLP. Factors Associated With Contraceptive Use In Reproductive Age Couples. Jurnal Ners dan Kebidanan Indonesia. 2019;7(1):47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21927/jnki.2019.7(1).47-53

Tayal C, Sharma R, Lata K. Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 2024;4:100156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100156

Mangimela-Mulundano A, Black KI, Cheney K. A cross-sectional study of women’s autonomy and modern contraception use in Zambia. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02101-5

Banjoko AW, Yahya WB, Garba MK, Afolayan RB, Dauda KA, Adewara DD. Investigation on Determinants and Choice of Contraceptive Usage among Nigeria Women of Reproductive Age. Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology. 2023;9(1):35-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v9i1.13975

BKKBN East Java Province Report on The Performance Accountability of The Government Agency Representative Office of BKKBN East Java Province for The Year 2023. Surabaya: BKKBN East Java Province; 2023.

Miller WB, Shain RN, Pasta DJ. Tubal sterilization or vasectomy: how do married couples make the choice? Fertility and Sterility. 1991;56(2):278–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54485-9

Lamba J, Gandotra N, Prashar N. Knowledge, attitude and practices of contraception amongst married women. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;8(7):2761. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193039

Aryati W, Wirawan DN, Sari KAK, Sawitri AAS. Determinants of long-acting contraceptives use among reproductive-age couples in Tanjung Karang Public Health Centre Mataram City, West Nusa Tenggara. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive. 2018;6(1):10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/phpma.v6i1.3

Johara J. Analysis of reproductive age (pus) couples education level by choosing of contraceptive methods at cempaka putih health center. Journal Educational of Nursing (JEN). 2023;6(1):23–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.37430/jen.v6i1.131

Hossain S, Akter T, Mohsin M, Islam MdM, Chowdhury PB, Khudri MM. Contraceptive uses among married women in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2024;43(1):10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41043-024-00502-w

Dhungana A, Nanthamongkolchai S, Pitikultang S. Factors Related to Intention to Undergo Female Sterilization Among Married Women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;6(1):539–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i1.14736

Ontiri S, Were V, Kabue M, Biesma-Blanco R, Stekelenburg J. Patterns and determinants of modern contraceptive discontinuation among women of reproductive age: Analysis of Kenya Demographic Health Surveys, 2003–2014. Todd CS, editor. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0241605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241605

Fataar K, Zweigenthal V, Harries J. Providers’ approaches to contraceptive provision in Cape Town. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health. 2022;3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.917881

Geltore TE, Lakew YY. Prevalence of male participation in modern contraceptive use among married men in Durame Town Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study, 2021. Pan African Medical Journal. 2022;41:307. http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.41.307.32402

Ahmed JM, Abrejo FG, Gul X, Saleem S. Men’s involvement in family planning programs: an exploratory study from Karachi, Pakistan. Reproductive Health. 2024;21(1):140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01875-1

Samari G, Foster DG, Ralph LJ, Rocca CH. Pregnancy preferences and contraceptive use among US women. Contraception. 2020;101(2):79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.007

Bansal A, Dwivedi LK. Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern? Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 2020;5(1):13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00115-8

Erlenwein J, Kundu S, Schippert C, Soergel P, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I. Attitude toward, acceptance of and knowledge about female sterilization as a method of contraception. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015;185:83–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.028

Eeckhaut MCW. Contraceptive Sterilization: Introducing A Couple Perspective to Examine Sociodemographic Differences in Use. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2017;49(3):173–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12033




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33846/hd20703

Refbacks





____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Health Dynamics || Open Access Journal || Online version only || Publisher: Knowledge Dynamics || ISSN: 3006-5518 (online) || Contact: healthdynamics.journal@gmail.com; +8801814901991; +6282136364408