Knowledge and Attitudes of Pregnant Women towards Bankjo Lamp Technology: Case Study of Choosing a Birth Place

Naning Siswati, Sunarto Sunarto, Astuti Setiyani, Nurwening Tyas Wisnu

Abstract


Background: A high-risk pregnancy jeopardizes both maternal and fetal lives. Despite recommendations for hospital births, six out of ten high-risk expectant mothers in Kawedanan opt for PMB or Community Health Center Maternity. To identify high-risk pregnancies, Kawedanan Community Health Center employs the innovative Bankjo lamp. This study investigates how pregnant women's attitudes and knowledge about Bankjo lamps influence their maternity location choice. Methods: This type of research uses quantitative descriptive research. This observational analytical research involved 57 expectant mothers due to maternity in January, February, or March. Using a cross-sectional design, the study treated knowledge and attitudes about Bankjo lamps as independent variables, with maternity location preference as the dependent variable. Data collection methods included knowledge and attitude questionnaires and monthly midwife reports. The data was analyzed using the Chi-Square test and descriptive statistics in the form of frequency distribution with presentation. Results: Findings indicate that pregnant women generally possess adequate knowledge about suitable maternity locations, with some showing insufficient understanding. A significant correlation (p = 0.013) exists between knowledge levels and preferred birthplace. Despite the preference for hospital births among nearly all expectant mothers, a majority hold negative attitudes, strongly correlated (p = 0.000) with their birthplace choices. Interestingly, while most pregnant women understand the Bankjo lamp innovation well, they harbor negative attitudes toward it. Nevertheless, almost all opt for hospital births, prioritizing medical safety despite reservations about new technologies. Conclusions: The study underscores the need for government support in advancing maternal health initiatives, including innovative technologies like Bankjo lamps. Enhancing awareness and promoting positive attitudes among expectant mothers can foster safer childbirth practices. By disseminating knowledge and addressing misconceptions, healthcare providers can better support high-risk pregnancies, ensuring better outcomes for both mothers and babies.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(4):3407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043407

Sahoo KC, Negi S, Patel K, Mishra BK, Palo SK, Pati S. Challenges in Maternal and Child Health Services Delivery and Access during Pandemics or Public Health Disasters in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2021;9(7):828. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070828

Bashir S, Ansari AH, Sultana A. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Antenatal Care Among Pregnant Women and its Association With Sociodemographic Factors: A Hospital-Based Study. Journal of Patient Experience. 2023;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735231183578

Gavic L, Maretic A, Putica S, Tadin A. Attitudes and knowledge of pregnant women about oral health. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2022;11(1):77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_382_21

Chang KJ, Seow KM, Chen KH. Preeclampsia: Recent Advances in Predicting, Preventing, and Managing the Maternal and Fetal Life-Threatening Condition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(4):2994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042994

Milella F, Minelli EA, Strozzi F, Croce D. Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. 2021; 13:395–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s301169

Nawabi F, Krebs F, Vennedey V, Shukri A, Lorenz L, Stock S. Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(7):3847. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073847

Jalili Bahabadi F, Estebsari F, Rohani C, Rahimi Khalifeh Kandi Z, Sefidkar R, Mostafaei D. <p>Predictors of Health-Promoting Lifestyle in Pregnant Women Based on Pender’s Health Promotion Model. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;12:71–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s235169

Rahman MdO, Yamaji N, Sasayama K, Yoneoka D, Ota E. Technology‐based innovative healthcare solutions for improving maternal and child health outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A network meta‐analysis protocol. Nursing Open. 2022;10(1):367–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1310

Haldane V, Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Singh SR, Koh GCH, Seng CK, et al. Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. Maulsby C, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216112

Jimah T, Borg H, Kehoe P, Pimentel P, Turner A, Labbaf S, et al. A Technology-Based Pregnancy Health and Wellness Intervention (Two Happy Hearts): Case Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021;5(11):e30991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30991

Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M, et al. The Promise of Digital Health: Then, Now, and the Future. NAM Perspectives. 2022;6(22). http://dx.doi.org/10.31478/202206e

Cooksey RW. Descriptive Statistics for Summarising Data. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data. 2020;61–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5

Gebremichael MA, Lema TB. Prevalence and Predictors of Knowledge and Attitude on Optimal Nutrition and Health Among Pregnant Women in Their First Trimester of Pregnancy [Corrigendum]. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2023; 15:1893–1894. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s450769

Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2022;37(16). http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e121

Lou S, Frumer M, Schlütter MM, Petersen OB, Vogel I, Nielsen CP. Experiences and expectations in the first trimester of pregnancy: a qualitative study. Health Expectations. 2017;20(6):1320–1329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12572

Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2018;09(03):604–634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091

Feng GC, Su X, Lin Z, He Y, Luo N, Zhang Y. Determinants of Technology Acceptance: Two Model-Based Meta-Analytic Reviews. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2020;98(1):83–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699020952400

Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International. 2021;2:100117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117

Lynch MM, Squiers LB, Kosa KM, Dolina S, Read JG, Broussard CS, et al. Making Decisions About Medication Use During Pregnancy: Implications for Communication Strategies. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2017;22(1):92–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2358-0

Rahman MdO, Yamaji N, Sasayama K, Yoneoka D, Ota E. Technology‐based innovative healthcare solutions for improving maternal and child health outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A network meta‐analysis protocol. Nursing Open. 2022;10(1):367–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1310

Vandever C. Introduction to Research Statistical Analysis: An Overview of the Basics. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine. 2020;1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1062

Chang KJ, Seow KM, Chen KH. Preeclampsia: Recent Advances in Predicting, Preventing, and Managing the Maternal and Fetal Life-Threatening Condition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(4):2994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042994

Yosef T, Tesfaye M. Pregnancy danger signs: Knowledge and health-seeking behavior among reproductive age women in southwest Ethiopia. Women’s Health. 2021;17:174550652110632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455065211063295

Correa-de-Araujo R, Yoon SS (Sarah). Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies Due to Advanced Maternal Age. Journal of Women’s Health. 2021;30(2):160–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8860

Yuill C, McCourt C, Cheyne H, Leister N. Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6

Sahoo J, Singh SV, Gupta VK, Garg S, Kishore J. Do socio-demographic factors still predict the choice of place of delivery: A cross-sectional study in rural North India. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015;5(S1):S27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2015.05.002

Zahedi R, Nemati-Anaraki L, Sedghi S, Shariat M. Factors Influencing Pregnant Women’s Use of Patient Decision Aids and Decision Making on Prenatal Screening: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health. 2021; http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v14i4.5205

Gesese SS, Mersha EA, Balcha WF. Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy and health-seeking action among pregnant women: a health facility-based cross-sectional study. Annals of Medicine & Surgery. 2023;85(5):1722–1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000000610

Itzchakov G, DeMarree KG. Attitudes in an interpersonal context: Psychological safety as a route to attitude change. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932413

Bosnjak M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2020;16(3):352–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107

Feng GC, Su X, Lin Z, He Y, Luo N, Zhang Y. Determinants of Technology Acceptance: Two Model-Based Meta-Analytic Reviews. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2020;98(1):83–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699020952400

McKiever M, Frey H, Costantine MM. Challenges in conducting clinical research studies in pregnant women. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. 2020;47(4):287–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-020-09687-z




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33846/hd10804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Health Dynamics || Open Access Journal || Online version only || Publisher: Knowledge Dynamics || ISSN: 3006-5518 (online) || Contact: healthdynamics.journal@gmail.com; +8801814901991; +6282136364408